Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ross Perry
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 21:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ross Perry[edit]
- Ross Perry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Ross Perry has never played in a senior football match, which means that he clearly fails both WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 19:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:53, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Isn't the Scottish Premier League a top-level league? --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 21:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- He hasn't played in the Scottish Premier League, or in any other competitive professional match. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 21:19, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ATHLETE as has never played in a fully pro league. пﮟოьεԻ 57 21:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no appearances, no notability. --Angelo (talk) 08:25, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, recreate if and when he makes an appearance. --Jimbo[online] 12:25, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Question does his appearance in the Friendly mentioned in the article count as an appearance at the highest level? If so than this is a keep; otherwise delete. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:44, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No, friendly games are not competitive, so they should just be ignored. --Angelo (talk) 14:52, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.