Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RosenkreuzStilette (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Non-admin close- article is a re-creation of deleted material, and has been submitted for G4 speedy deletion. --Clay Collier (talk) 12:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RosenkreuzStilette[edit]

See previous discussion. The game is still not notable, is still self-published, and the only sources are a messageboard and the official website. Suggest deletion and salt. roux 03:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 03:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom, previous AFD.Wacko Jack O 04:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - If not speedy as recreated deleted content. --Clay Collier (talk) 11:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- - You're right, it should be a speedy for recreating deleted content.Wacko Jack O 11:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- - What's the policy - in this case - on nominating an article for Speedy deletion in the middle of an AFD?Wacko Jack O 11:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - I suspect the best thing to do is to go ahead and tag the article for speedy deletion, and go ahead and close the AfD. --Clay Collier (talk) 12:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - - I tagged the article for speedy delete. However, I didn't see where they mentioned how exactly one closes an AFD, when I read through close.Wacko Jack O 12:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.