Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosario Poidimani (3 nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily deleted.  Denelson83  20:57, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Rosario Poidimani

Here we go againg. This is the second time user Manuel de Sousa, either declared or hidden behind IPs recreates this article after being decided here for deletion. Now he is making fun at all wikipedia users. Old decisions to delete are in here and here. This user has a history of ignoring community decisions, here and in wiki-pt where he was blocked already several times.

Againg: references to this pretender only exist in three places: 1) his own sites, wikipedia mirrors and wikipedia. Wikipedia can not be used as a platform for this kind of thing. It's not for this that Jim Wales created this project.

Relevant policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability

Please remember to be civil and assume good faith. muriel@pt 13:08, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

• delete again muriel@pt 13:24, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• delete: --BBird 13:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC) I have been trying to make some sense and perspective out of this subject for some time, mostly in vain as it is constantly reedited by MdeSousa and an anon (always the same and whose only contributions are in this and narowly related articles).
• Delete! The Ogre 13:20, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, appears to be a hoax/nn person. Google search for "Rosario Saxe Coburg Gotha Bragança", claimed in the article to be his full name returns only 2 Wikipedia pages, and one mirror from answers.com. Bjelleklang - talk 13:36, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as reconstruction of previously deleted content. Ruby 14:24, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above, and please... Protect the page afterwards. —This user has left wikipedia 14:40 2006-01-24
• Delete contents and redirect to Hilda Toledano. Choess 18:18, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

• keep I see the return of Muriel, the famous Duarte Pio supporter! You affirms Rosario only exists in wikipedia and in his web page... this is FALSE. See : [[1]], [[2]], [[3]], [[4]], and also the administrator of Forum Monarquia Portugal writes: [[5]] and in many other web pages......

Dom Rosario is a pretender of The Royal House of Portugal and so has the right to stay in wikipedia also because he has many supporters and his rights are also confirmed by many impartial judges [[6]] M.deSousa, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete once again, for reasons noted before. A redirect in its place to Hilda Toledano and protection would be ideal. - Nunh-huh 19:36, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I can only assume that this article, in one form or another, is going to be recreated over and over in order to keep the "claim" - in some format - alive on Wikpedia. Hence delete is probably insufficient and some form of blocking should be used. (Quite what I am not sure). Marcus22 19:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: insignificant nothingness. And it would be impossible to write a fairly non-pov article on that, given Manuel's/Rosario's attitude. Velho 19:51, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.