Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosanna Mangiarelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:36, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rosanna Mangiarelli[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG as she lacks significant coverage. While the subject is sometimes featured in The Advertiser, articles such as this feature a promotional tone that seems to link the subject to the paper. Besides The Advertiser, the subject is not featured in reliable sources except for a trivial mention in a Sydney Morning Herald article. According to GNG, "Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability", thus the single reliable source of The Advertiser fails significant coverage. A redirect could be made to her place of employment at Today Tonight. JoshMuirWikipedia (talk) 09:30, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 May 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:44, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (talk) 12:06, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.