Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosa Otárola

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Colegio Niño Jesús de Praga. merge as necessary Spartaz Humbug! 21:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rosa Otárola[edit]

Rosa Otárola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Limited coverage (1 local newspaper obituary), and she does not appear to have made any contribution/feat that might make her notable. See Wikipedia:Notability (people). Sietecolores (talk) 11:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. — Sietecolores (talk) 11:33, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  11:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  11:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sietecolores (talk) 14:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sietecolores you must have me confused with someone else. I did not remotely mention 3 sources. I reviewed sources on the web for the sister and found no further references to her. I found multiple references for the school. If indeed there are 3 sources on the file about the school which are independent of her then her reference will be an additional independent source for the school. I did not evaluate the article on the school, it is not part of this AfD discussion. SusunW (talk) 14:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The clear up the confusion I meant the three sources on the school article. Sietecolores (talk) 14:57, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sietecolores As the link you provided below shows, each file is evaluated on its own merit. I don't know you or Grez, am not Chilean, nor Catholic, my input is neutral. I came here because a WikiProject I am involved in received an alert that the file was nominated. I do not find sources to substantiate a keep, though her contribution to building a school is one that should not be minimized and should be part of the school record. If you wish to nominate the school, that is a different discussion. SusunW (talk) 15:57, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Diego Grez-Cañete, can you show a link to that consensus (?) so that I don't nominate anything for deletion in vain (which would be a waste of time for us all). Sietecolores (talk) 10:35, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or merge. Subject is notable at a regional level for her contribution to education. This AFD, like others by Sietecolores, may be biased against Pichilemu-related topics. --Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.