Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosa Filmes
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:27, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rosa Filmes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable film production company. DavidEfraim (talk) 15:28, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. DavidEfraim (talk) 15:28, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:23, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The article does not cover the criterion WP:GNG. I don`t notice significant coverage with reliable sources. --Bigneeerman (talk) 05:24, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.