Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Root Capital
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The article meets WP:GNG and WP:NONPROFIT (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 14:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Root Capital (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, plenty of business listings on charity sites, but no independent coverage in reliable sources. Kleuske (talk) 07:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. As per User:Kleuske.Knox490 (talk) 04:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 07:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep' Coverage in Capital and the Common Good (Columbia University Press), Fourteen Points for the Twenty-First Century (University of Kentucky Press), Sustainable Economy and Emerging Markets (T&F) and other books, Americas Quarterly article, more than meets GNG or NONPROFIT guidelines. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:56, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio 14:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio 14:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Keep based on sources found by Eddie891. But... WP:NCORP / NONPROFIT has a high bar, and coverage in Capital and the Common Good and Fourteen Points for the Twenty-First Century doesn't seem substantial (I can't see the whole text), so may not count for notability. Americas Quarterly counts. This appears notable / borderline notable, no objection to userifying, relisting, or a new AfD. Widefox; talk 22:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.