Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rooprai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:14, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rooprai[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not have any encyclopedic value. Theman244 (talk) 00:00, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:43, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is of encyclopedic value, although it is badly written. AFD is not cleanup. Could be merged if a suitable merge target is identified. Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:24, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Page should not be deleted as it gives information about Ramgarhia clan like other clans of Punjabi tribes/castes that does not have any encyclopaedic value. ☬ ਰਾਮਗੜ੍ਹੀਆ ਮੁੰਡਾ ☬ ^☎ 22:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Just because it is terrible doesn't mean it will remain that way. I do not have assess to the clans of India book, but the subject of caste and clans has been researched in India by scholars since the 1800s. Non-english sources will be needed to fill this out. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:26, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 21:51, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.