Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roomi S. Hayat (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Roomi S. Hayat[edit]

Roomi S. Hayat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in my searches. Fails WP:GNG. WP is WP:NOTLINKEDIN. Störm (talk) 19:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 20:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 20:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 20:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Non notable person. L3X1 (distænt write) 20:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This article should never have made it past AFC.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Bio of non notable person. Two sources relies on his WP:INTERVIEW. Two sources shows error messages. Sources number, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 (including one dead) are not about him but about a particular organization he is involved with and all sourced with the organization's website. Sources 2, 4, 5 and 6 are also more about the organization than him, Sources 3 and 2 are his own presented paper and interview. News search shows there is no sufficient independent sources to establish notability here, if any article will exist may be (with some more sources) the organization but not this person.–Ammarpad (talk) 15:41, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.