Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronnie Paris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser ^TSU 10:21, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ronnie Paris[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A sad story but not notable $Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...)$ 12:36, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:CRIME notability criteria. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:44, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Easily flies over WP:GNG, also unlikely anyone has done anything about WP:BEFORE, like looking for sources which do seem available. Insomesia (talk) 01:13, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if more sources indicating sustained interest are added. Rivertorch (talk) 18:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, agree that it easily satisfies WP:N, specifically coverage in multiple secondary sources that fit WP:RS. — Cirt (talk) 20:32, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:13, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:13, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:13, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.