Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Read

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 20:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Read

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual. WP:NOTNEWS. This "biography" reads like a slow news day's "...and finally" section. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Does have significant coverage: this story has gone round the world - there is also "Former janitor who lived modestly leaves millions in surprise donations", News.com.au, 6 February 2015; "Former janitor leaves $6 million to local hospital and library in Vermont", Daily Telegraph, 5 February 2015; and others. This is a life story, not one event : Noyster (talk), 14:02, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A story that's "gone round the world" in the day of the internet. Well blow me down. This is obviously WP:ROUTINE and not-notable. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 14:34, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTNEWS, WP:ONEEVENT and WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Not enough for notability. Beagel (talk) 18:16, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as above, interesting but not notable.Mighty Antar (talk) 02:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.