Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Hennessey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Hennessey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He had an interesting life, but I don't think the small mentions of him add up to WP:GNG and I can't see that he meets WP:BIO. Boleyn (talk) 18:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 20:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 20:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 20:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot tell -- The article is far too brief to establish that he was notable. He might have been as a campaigner against what the US was up to in Central America, but the book cited sounds sensationalist. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now at best as Books found some links but this is still questionable. SwisterTwister talk 02:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is the one book about him, and a newspapers.com search turned up one article that I can't view because it requires the "Publisher's Extra" subscription. But that's it for in-depth sources. It is possible that there are more offline sources, but what I can see isn't enough. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.