Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Beilke
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Ron Beilke[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ron Beilke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unnotable mayor of a relatively small city, fails WP:GNG, WP:NPOL and WP:NCRIME. This might be something but I don't believe it meets the threshold of notability. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 February 19. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Crime, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG, possibly unsourced BLP (unless someone else can open the source.) SportingFlyer T·C 10:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Most of the secondary sources are all fairly WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN. The criminal activity [1] [2] [3] also seems to fail WP:CRIME and not notable either. Shaws username . talk . 20:03, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 02:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.