Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rome Dela Rosa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to San Beda Red Lions. Wifione ^Message 11:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rome Dela Rosa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails notability for basketball figures. NoyPiOka (talk) 08:53, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 November 19. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 08:55, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NHOOPS and WP:NCOLLATH. No objections to a redirect if the team has a WP page.204.126.132.231 (talk) 20:03, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to San Beda Red Lions per above, as he has only played at the college level at the moment. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 22:06, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He used up all of his college eligibility this year, and played his last college game earlier this month, so unless he has no intention of going pro, this should not be deleted. –H T D 01:37, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Until he actually goes pro, he isn't notable (at least not yet); if he joins the PBA then the article can be recreated. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:54, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how it works; the "floor" is WP:GNG. If he surpasses that, he's good even if he's a high school player. The article doesn't explain that he convincingly pass WP:GNG though. –H T D 09:30, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:25, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.