Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Schomburg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz ^talk 14:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Schomburg[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. Search finds nothing more than social media accounts and agency listings etc., and the sources cited are no better, only online CVs and passing mentions as cast member, hence fails WP:GNG. The few film appearances aren't anywhere near major enough to satisfy WP:NACTOR notability, either.

A duplicate of this exists in the draft space, rejected earlier at AfC on notability grounds and awaiting re-review; meanwhile this was published with the same issues. I'm not quite sure what the process is, but I'd say if this AfD results in deletion, the draft probably needs to go as well? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The cut & paste move (& technical copyright violation created thereby) has been repaired by a history merge; the draft no longer exists.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2021-04 ↻ restored, 2021-04 ✗ G6

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.