Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Catholic Diocese of Chiavari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (WP:SNOW close). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Catholic Diocese of Chiavari[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hi, want to delete this page cause it's not relevant. Winuserunlimited (talk) 21:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:16, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:16, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:16, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep dioceses are notable.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:56, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Bye, that's not how it works. It's a diocese. It's sourced. It's in the heart of the Roman Catholic homeland. We're not deleting this. Nate • (chatter) 02:29, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per E.M.Gregory and Mrschimpf. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:07, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously Keep - Can penalties be considered for people who initiate pointless, poorly justified (to the point of absurdity), and disruptive AFDs? Is there a wikipedia policy for this? XavierItzm (talk) 06:34, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep: The freaking hell? This nom deserves a serious trout slap for (a) nominating an active Roman Catholic Diocese with over a hundred parishes, and (b) on such a bloody specious and illegitimate ground. Nha Trang ^Allons! 19:35, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep nominator is a blocked sock who has repeatedly tried to get this article deleted. Sro23 (talk) 18:48, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SNOW. With 139 parishes, it's a decent-sized RCC diocese. Bearian (talk) 01:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --do ncr am 18:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - No valid rationale presented for deletion. Carrite (talk) 01:30, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.