Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roloway purp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, zero indication of any importance and obvious self-promotion. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Roloway purp[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article squeaks past being speediable, but it's nevertheless obvious self-promotion of an extremely non-notable hip-hop group. Claims to fame include a handful of tweets and a soundcloud upload with around 300 plays and no coverage to speak of. Opabinia regalis (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if this hadn't been nominated here, I would have speedied as spam and nn Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.