Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rollercoaster World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rollercoaster World[edit]

(Find video game sources: "Rollercoaster World" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

This is a completely non-notable RollerCoaster Tycoon copycat. Gamerankings and MobyGames found no reliable reviews and/or articles talking about this game, and Google searches proved likewise. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 01:26, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm indifferent to Delete or Keep but there are articles on the game and also not a "copycat" of RollerCoaster Tycoon... it's is part of the Tycoon franchise. Mobygames Link IGN link and there are more... Pmedema (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think you've might've been misled here. The MobyGames link is a self-released user review and the IGN link reviews a different game that could be also considered similar to Rollercoaster Tycoon, Theme Park Roller Coaster. Also, where is the evidence that saids Rollercoaster World is officially a part of the Rollercoaster Tycoon series and not a rip-off of it? edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎 23:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non-notable video game failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. I see a few passing mentions and a lot of directory entries, but nothing substantial. Being a "copycat" is irrelevant for notability. There's some confusion on the name and it seems there are a bunch of very similarly named games. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 22:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.