Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roller Coaster Rumbler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 01:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Roller Coaster Rumbler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Roller Coaster Rumbler violates WP:GNG Yoshiman6464 (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2016 (UTC) Creating deletion discussion for Roller Coaster Rumbler[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my searches noticeably found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 04:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

keep [1] is something, but clearly there were paper reviews [2] for example. This is an old game, sources will generally be paper-only. Hobit (talk) 09:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you confirm that (1) those mentions are reviews, and (2) that they exist? czar 13:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have access to the paper if that's what you are asking. But yeah, I'd say that the abime.net link is believable--compiling things like that is what it does. Hobit (talk) 13:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Multiple reviews referenced at Mobygames. - hahnch e n 18:39, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Indexed reviews from reliable non-English languages publications (video game magazines). So sources do exist, but they're unverified, untranslated, and thus this article is very unlikely to be reliably expanded in any reasonable timeframe. czar 11:00, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.