Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roll with the Punches

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Two (Lenka album). (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 02:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roll with the Punches[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like an advert. No prove it reached the charts, if not so would fail on notability. Outdated. The Banner talk 22:22, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Two (Lenka album), on which this song appears. Plausible search term but I'm not seeing much in independent reliable sources to suggest the song warrants a separate article. Gong show 03:13, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Two (Lenka album), this song wasn't a big hit and the artist is somewhat obscure. If kept, the article should be rewritten into the past tense, since the single and album are both clearly now out. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:12, 28 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Redirect to Two (Lenka album), fails WP:NSONG. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 07:38, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.