Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roleplayers Ring

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten 21:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roleplayers Ring[edit]

Letting the Wikipedia community decide on this, for me its just some player guild from the game Ultima Online--Jestix 06:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per OR and NN. NeoFreak 06:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is not a player guild it is clearly an online community. You may search roleplaying for details. If we're going to delete a center for roleplayers we might as well remove roleplaying from wikipedia as well. Lenapeco911 07:47, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? Why would we remove a major article like roleplaying if we remove a minor example of one facet of it? That's a total logical fallacy. Daveydw ee b (^chat/_patch) 10:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Daveydw ee b (^chat/_patch) 10:03, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unless this ~~guild~~ community has done something utterly exceptional. Clans and guilds need to be extremely well known to be included here, and this one just doesn't appear to live up to that. Daveydw ee b (^chat/_patch) 10:16, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~keep~~ Again this is not a guild, so both the reason that it needs to be deleted because it is a guild or because it is not a well known guild is invaild. It's not a guild. If you even consider well known guilds as you mentioned, then wouldn't a center for Roleplayers and guilds of all types be good enough?

I say again the reason for deletion isn't good enough because this is not a guild. Please remove your delete request and start a new one if you really feel the need. Lenapeco911 15:34, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does it fulfill WP:WEB? --Jestix 19:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harassment Jestix can you stop harassing me, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lenapeco911 (talk • contribs)

The preceding was moved from below, as this user's second !vote. Daveydw ee b (^chat/_patch) 09:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable. Nickieee 19:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sources, fails to meet WP:WEB and/or WP:ORG guidelines for inclusion. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:04, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. -Simoes 02:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Wickethewok 20:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This roleplaying community is similar to This article and actually covers more than one on line game. I woulld suggest that an online community that has a decent amount of members and covers several online games and different guild or groups within itself is noteworthy. Thordice 19:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.