Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rokšped
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rokšped (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ORGCRIT. No SIGCOV whatsoever. 〜 Festucalex • talk 21:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - I could find no coverage other than this brief press release. No obvious redirect targets. Suriname0 (talk) 00:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.