Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Gupta (comedian)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 07:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rohit Gupta (comedian)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded without rationale or improvement (adding a citation from "quora" is hardly an improvement). While The Nation article is a nice piece about him, it's really the only bit of in-depth coverage I can find about this person from independent, reliable sources. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : Not enough reliable sources to establish notability. Search engines don't reveal anything that can add to notability. Coderzombie (talk) 17:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 17:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only reliable source I could find about the subject is:
1. Tahir, Aimen (2016-05-09). "Rohit Gupta is emerging as a standout entertainer". The Nation. Retrieved 2017-06-26.
One source is not sufficient to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. If another reliable source that provides significant coverage about the subject can be found in the future, I'd support recreation of the article.
Cunard (talk) 04:46, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.