Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Chauhan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Materialscientist (talk) 07:19, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rohit Chauhan[edit]

Rohit Chauhan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Supposed actor with only an IMDB reference. The article was previously filled out with text copied verbatim from Khesari Lal Yadav which may indicate a hoax article here. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk   16:48, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete Speedy was wrongfully deleted by the page creator - I have restored it. Spam at best, hoax at worst. --Drm310 (talk) 16:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete This article looks to be (as was mentioned) copied and really probably speedy deleted without any fuss. Joel.Miles925 17:10, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, no speedy Author removed AFD and speedy tag again. Right now, I'm on team delete, but opposed to the speedy. Tried to remove the overtly promotional content. Let's see if anyone can come up with verifiable sources here even if it is clearly a COI account. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete: Nothing to support any claim but I would say best photoshop the only thing they forget to edit is sunglasses. GSS (talk) 17:48, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.