Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Cossack
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:50, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Roger Cossack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This former TV legal analyst fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete PROMO, other than being a lawyer that was interviewed on CNN, I don't see anything we can use for notability. Visiting prof at the university isn't notable. Oaktree b (talk) 02:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per reasons above, and article is all primary sources. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 04:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Individual does not appear to pas WP:ANYBIO given the lack of sources available. Quick citation check does not hint at possibility of this person meeting WP:ACADEMIC either MaxnaCarta (talk) 04:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Law. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. 2001:4455:61D:DB00:4184:9335:4EB4:685F (talk) 12:28, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: IP has only three edits all in AFD MaxnaCarta (talk) 13:06, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.