Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rogelio Andaverde

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:12, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rogelio Andaverde

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is a living person notable only for a single event, and the article does not maintain a neutral point of view as a result. I don't see any obvious merge or redirect targets, so I propose to delete. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, United States of America, and Texas. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: a $5000 bond isn't what makes criminal notability, this is rather routine. He's simply not notable for what's happened. Oaktree b (talk) 23:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete News of the weird-type police blotter item with no staying power. Mangoe (talk) 23:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete man in the news for not a unique/lasting "news of the weird" does not make for notability. Also WP:BLP. Star Mississippi 03:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Appears to fall under WP:NOTNEWS, with no lasting coverage suggesting that this was a notable incident. WP:BLPCRIME issues abound as well. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.