Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodrigo Banzer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 06:00, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Rodrigo Banzer[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rodrigo Banzer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. JTtheOG (talk) 21:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Tennis, and Bolivia. JTtheOG (talk) 21:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I have found some Spanish language sources that I think show that this player meets GNG [1] [2]. I also found some passing mentions about his college career, including one in the NYT, which suggests there could be more coverage in other sources, but this is what I was able to find with a quick Google search. Iffy★Chat -- 09:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Google News going back to 2014 has nothing beyond passing mentions in routine match reports. The 20minutos source from above has half a sentence on him ("so the match ended with victory for the Bolivian tennis player Rodrigo Banzer"). ✘ Página Siete from above is also a standard tournament recap and only mentions him twice. ✘ The NYT article literally only says "Christian Sigsgaard, Colin Markes and Rodrigo Banzer also won their singles matches to lead Texas to the title." ✘ The rest of the coverage I found was just more trivial mentions in regular sports reporting: [3], [4], [5], [6]. ✘ Unambiguous GNG fail. JoelleJay (talk) 23:32, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As per JoelleJay. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:43, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.