Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod Espinosa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:28, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rod Espinosa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this author. Joe Chill (talk) 00:48, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- NotAnonymous0 did I err?|Contribs 01:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- NotAnonymous0 did I err?|Contribs 01:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep the Eisner Award nomination has me convinced he's notable, but the sourcing definitely needs help. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:14, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Starblind. - Gabby 17:41, 30 April 2010 (PST)
Weak keep But needs major cleanup and needs much more sourcing. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:34, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have started adding some sources, and it looks like there is quite a bit out there (a few are non-english though, but I will specify these ones). Jwoodger (talk) 02:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.