Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocky Stone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:14, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rocky Stone[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. I reorganized and sectioned the article to separate his career from his charity work, but the only third-party reference to his career is a mere mention, most of the article was and is sourced to IMDb and his own website, and I was unable to find the other Toronto Star reference referred to. A search for additional references also came up empty. I removed the list of stars endorsing his charity work as not contributing to notability, and the praise received for that does not in itself rise to the level of a major award that would confer notability. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:40, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:40, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Talent agent is not an occupation where we extend an automatic presumption of notability just because the person exists, but this is not reliably sourced well enough to get him past WP:GNG. I actually was able to find the other Toronto Star reference on a ProQuest database search — but it doesn't assist a GNG pass, because it glancingly namechecks the existence of Rocky's Kidz but fails to be about it, and doesn't even mention Rocky Stone as a person at all. Bearcat (talk) 14:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete totally unnotable as an actor, and not notable as a talent agent either. Talent agents need actual coverage to be notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm unable to find in-depth coverage to show that this person meets WP:GNG. gongshow talk 01:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.