Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock dangdut
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Rock dangdut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Okay, this one is a bit different. I have done google searches and I find, literally, hundreds of thousands of results, but that is only due to Rock being put with the term Dangdut. I do see some sources that have the two terms used together, but they are mainly saying that Dangdut can sound like rock on rare occasions. Having stated that, this article should either be deleted, or merged if a better article can be found. This page lists no sources and I don't see any reliable third party sources either. My vote is for delete. Undead Warrior (talk) 19:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Undead Warrior (talk) 19:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: article fails to established notability, per WP:MUSIC. JamesBurns (talk) 00:53, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete since no verifiable sources or significant coverage can be found (and the article as it stands is singularly unhelpful in helping editors find sources). Drmies (talk) 16:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, agree with the nom that this is different than most AfDs. Agree with a merge, but only if one can be found. As is, delete. --Bobak (talk) 19:32, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The nom hit it on the head. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.