Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rochelle Gadd (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rochelle Gadd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was deleted back in January and then moved to an editors userspace in May - That user had added a few sources and then disappeared so I've moved it back to article space

Most sources in the article are very minimal mentions, YouTube videos and a wikipedia article, I still can't find any evidence of notability and so I still believe she fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010^Talk 21:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010^Talk 21:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010^Talk 21:09, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Of all my searches, I only found two links at thefreelibrary; no significant and notable coverage and this isn't surprising as she has not had any major roles. SwisterTwister talk 19:30, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kraxler (talk) 17:05, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:38, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.