Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roch Hanmore (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:50, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roch Hanmore[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous kept as no consensus when the quality and importance of his playing at the 2011 Australian Football International Cup was overstated. Despite the lofty title, this is a development competition of amateur players and is not even close to being the 4th level of Australian rules football, let alone the top level. Only played minor level Gaelic football, so I don't consider that sufficient either. The-Pope (talk) 01:47, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. 01:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC) — The-Pope (talk) 01:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. 01:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC) — The-Pope (talk) 01:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. 02:57, 25 August 2012 (UTC) — The-Pope (talk) 02:57, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 00:13, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources, only passing mentions, so fails WP:GNG and playing in the Australian Football International Cup doesn't even come close to assumed notability. Jenks24 (talk) 06:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - His name is mentioned in two source articles.[1][2] That's not enought source material to write a Wikipedia biography on Roch Hanmore. The topic doesn't meet WP:GNG. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 07:31, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.