Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocco A. Errico

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 10:07, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rocco A. Errico[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Seems to be a self-published minister with no notability in books, other than his own. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:25, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bible-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- unsourced original research and a tribute page. I've located one, brief review of the subject's work here:

The Mysteries of Creation. Winterhalter, Robert. Journal of Religion & Psychical Research, Oct 01, 1993; Vol. 16, No. 4, p. 232. Reviews the book 'The Mysteries of Creation: The Genesis Story,' by Rocco A. Errico. more...

But I don't think this is sufficient. Does not appear to be a significant scholar. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:07, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and K.e.coffman's extensive scrutiny. Ifnord (talk) 17:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.