Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Danar (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:17, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Danar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It looks like this article is an ad for an unknown audio engineer and i think it doesn't meet WP:BIO and WP:V. Some coverage from at least one reliable third-party source would change my mind. Ubot16 (talk) 20:34, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not appear to be notable. The tone of the article doesn't help: "Robin is a modern version of what the music industry once was." Oh, please. Previous nomination was closed as "no consensus" due mainly to lack of participation in the AfD discussion. That was two years ago but the article hasn't gotten any better. --MelanieN (talk) 05:04, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — JL 09 ^talk_contribs 18:13, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. Possibly a notable producer, but the hype in this article needs to be significantly toned down. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:45, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete GNews, when prodded sufficiently, coughs up less than ten hits, all of them passing mentions in reviews of various recordings. Mangoe (talk) 15:49, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.