Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberts list of greatest presidents
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Roberts list of greatest presidents[edit]
- Roberts list of greatest presidents (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is original research - the author's own opinion. Contested PROD. JohnCD (talk) 21:00, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —JohnCD (talk) 21:08, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —JohnCD (talk) 21:08, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete This looks like a fourth grade term paper. And Adoil Descended (talk) 21:51, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Just some kid's opinion with some pretty weird choices included to boot - The Bushes were better Presidents than Woodrow Wilson apparently! Keresaspa (talk) 03:12, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Shouldn't be here. Suraj T 06:57, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Personal opinion piece. Wikipedia is not a blog. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 18:12, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - I tried to have it deleted under G11, as "the lofty glorification directed toward the various presidents and the tone that sounded like the USA was the only country that ever existed made me feel that it was enough to fall under G11 and WP:NOTPROMOTION". --Σ talkcontribs 19:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research and pure POV pushing. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per WP:NOTBLOG snd WP:NPOV. Baseball Watcher 20:48, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all the reasons given above but to respect the new user who added it, I think the debate should go the full distance and it should not be speedied. --Bduke (Discussion) 04:27, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.