Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto Vidal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 00:24, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Roberto Vidal[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was proposed for deletion by another user, which was declined. Bringing this to AfD for a wider discussion. My WP:BEFORE searches are not qualifying an article for the subject; not finding any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Additionally, the article presently has six sources, all of which are primary, which do not serve to establish notability. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:33, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per my original PROD rationale, which was "Not seeing any indication of independent notability that would meet WP:GNG. Sources provided are church publications, which I don't consider independent. Even if they were, it would still fail the part of WP:N that requires worldwide notice by general-audience publications." ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:08, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete At this time the article subject does not meet WP:GNG. Sources are weak. And I see nothing unique that makes this person notable at this time.BabbaQ (talk) 08:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. The individual does not and can not get any sources independent of the church, and thus fails WP:GNG.Rollidan (talk) 14:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.