Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto Badalotti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:20, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Roberto Badalotti[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. No effective references. Non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 19:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete mostly self promotional. Property developer profile is not encylopedic. Teraplane (talk) 00:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject is notable. Article is an orphan. Sleako (talk) 02:21, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no coverage for the subject. Present in the article are four references. One is a blog which meets WP:NOT as being self-published. One is announcement, one is a subscription [1] which expressly forbidden as an advert per Wikipedia Terms of Use and the other one is an a very short profile style interview, self-published on his own site, again failing WP:NOT. The references are entirely unsuitable for a BLP. scope_creep^Talk 07:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - notability is not inherited from the company, article has serious PROMO issues. 1292simon (talk) 08:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No where near enough RS to make this a notable subject. 16:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.