Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert William John Shannon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 06:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Robert William John Shannon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A Google search on Shannon returns nothing but Wikipedia articles. Not notable. —Andrew_stalk 03:35, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —Andrew_stalk 03:39, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete User has created an article about himself, Clear COI! DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 04:41, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am an inventor, and I have referred to the inventions that have been filed. You won't see them in a general internet search, since they are protected intellectual property. They are publicly viewable and the various patent and trademark office databases. If this reads like a biography, and I see that under the wikipedia policies that this is frowned upon. Then by all means delete it. I'll create a new one that conforms.Joshannon (talk) 07:51, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the style of writing that's the problem, it's the fact that the subject fails notability criteria. Furthermore, writing an autobiography is strongly discouraged. —Andrew_stalk 08:59, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Appears to fail notability. No indication that any of these patents is especially important - SimonLyall (talk) 09:21, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. Schwede 66 05:08, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Can't find anything that brings it over the notability threshold.NealeFamily (talk) 09:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.