Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Vancina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Vancina

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A cold fusion entrepreneur who claims, as they all do, to have the solution to our energy needs. I leave it to the reader to decide what they think of these claims, but suffice to say, the WP:BLPFRINGE nature of this biography is one that uses fringe sources only. This includes cold fusion fansites, obscure uncited journal articles, and PR news websites. Other claims to notability are lacking. jps (talk) 00:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG and Roxy's fruit test. -Roxy, the dog. barcus 00:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Cannot find sources in large English newspapers, indicating a lack of notability. The current article's sources are in-universe. —Paleo Neonate – 05:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete In addition to all the above points: When one of the sources is OMICS, you know you have a problem. XOR'easter (talk) 15:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Citations 2, 5 and 6 are to OMICS journals. Other sources are either fringe or not WP:RS that could justify notability. Fails WP:PERSON. Burn with fire. - LuckyLouie (talk) 20:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Irradiate No evidence of notability in the wider world outside the cold fusion bubble. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 16:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the very type of article our guidelines about Fringe figures were created to prevent.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:46, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.