Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Rooks (NAACP Criminal Justice Director)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 08:39, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Robert Rooks (NAACP Criminal Justice Director) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No substantial 3rd party sources that discuss the subject. Only source cited is his NAACP profile. Google News searches bring up results where he is quoted as part of his job but none that are specifically about him. Fails WP:BASIC aspects of WP:BIO. Tassedethe (talk) 17:18, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep nominator is correct that there are a number of sources where he's quoted as a part of his job. See [1] and [2]. It's not enough to establish notability as per the WP:GNG. But I suspect that something can be found with a bit more digging. I may be wrong. Vcessayist (talk) 01:02, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Zero references that even mention him. The one reference (a web page) does not even mention him. North8000 (talk) 19:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unfortunately, unless more content can be established from secondary sources, the page doesn't seem about to demonstrate sufficient notability. I would be willing to keep if this problem could be fixed. Fireflo (talk) 13:22, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.