Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Reynolds (manager/lawyer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:57, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Reynolds (manager/lawyer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability Zacaparum (talk) 00:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 November 1. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 00:34, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is mere self-promotion. This a a lawyer who represents famous people as a lawyer and a manager. He is not himself notable. He even goes so far as to list the successful records of his clients, as if that makes HIM notable. So what? Most famous people (including rock stars) have lawyers; that doesn't mean every such lawyer gets his own Wikipedia article.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:02, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:02, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:02, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there's nothing I see that this attorney passes my standards much less general notability. He was not on law review nor in moot court, according to this bio. A great many lawyers, myself included, have managed or represented bands. The burden is on the proponent to prove notability; I just don't see it. Bearian (talk) 22:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Even though I totally agree this should be deleted, It think it's worth mentioning that it's not any one in particular's responsibility to prove notability of a given article. It's a community effort.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 16:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The fact that he has represented some notable people, doesn't make him notable. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 00:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above discussion. Notability is not transferrable.—Esprit15d • talk • contribs 16:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.