Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Peluso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Peluso[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable publisher/businessman, or academic. There is no record of him as a publisher, the academic criteria here don't seem to fit either. Oaktree b (talk) 14:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Businesspeople. Oaktree b (talk) 14:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence that he passes the requirements of NSCHOLAR or NAUTHOR, and no sources sufficient for GNG. Most of the sources in the article are primary, except for the Pittsburgh Magazine piece and the Littsburgh entry, both of which appear to be at least somewhat promotional and not entirely independent of Peluso. I can't find anything more than this myself. WJ94 (talk) 14:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.