Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Meadmore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Even the nominator says "appears to be notable?" Phil Bridgers links need to be incorporated into the article, so I'm marking this cleanup. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 01:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Robert Meadmore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to be notable after reading the article, but when doing a search, couldn't find any content that associates the musician with any professional media organizations. Gary King (talk) 20:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Nominated for top award and hit the charts. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:57, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Phil Bridger. Meets WP:MUSIC, as has evidently been nominated for a major music award. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.