Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Mascara

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Mascara[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Minor television worker, fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENTERTAINER. Only one media article, a puff piece from 2003. WWGB (talk) 03:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 03:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 03:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I also found coverage in Q Magazine, the Melbourne Observer, the Herald Sun and the TV Tonight blog. Moswento (talk | contribs) 11:33, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the two latter sources found by Moswento (the former two are non-pinpoint and 404, respectively). Bearian (talk) 23:26, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable.--Grahame (talk) 23:57, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- How so? There are several reliable sources related to him. 72.137.97.65 (talk) 23:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:21, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the links to the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age publications. 72.137.97.65 (talk) 23:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: having a reliable source does not make him notable, it provides evidence of his existence not his notability.--Grahame (talk) 00:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete article is full of uncited claims, sources provided are not in-depth to meet WP:BIO. 08:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.