Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Marting (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Marting

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable fitness trainer. WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of reliable secondary sources. Was previously subject of an AFD in 2009, appears to have been kept on the basis of two uncredited appearances on magazine covers, I’m not sure this would satisfy WP:BLP by current policy standards. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 12:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 12:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 12:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 12:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 12:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't see any significant independent coverage. An occasional quote from him in an article about something else, but nothing substantive about him, his videos or his writing - nothing that would contribute towards a pass WP:GNG, or that would meet any applicable SNG that I can think of. GirthSummit _(blether) 12:17, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we cannot keep an article where the only source is the subject's own website.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.