Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert M Howard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:24, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Robert M Howard[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Businessman who does not seem to meet WP:GNG. Appears to be written by an editor with an undeclared conflict of interest. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:14, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:15, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:16, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:38, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, possibly WP:TOOSOON. A lot of the references aren't about him at all, and the references to him being CEO of Telligent aren't enough for WP:GNG. There is a Bloomberg bio [1] but that's about it. Regarding a redirect to Telligent; he is at a new company which may become notable, so a redirect may be inappropriate. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.