Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Herrick (broadcaster)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xclamation point 03:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Robert Herrick (broadcaster)[edit]
- Robert Herrick (broadcaster) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article is written about me, it is innaccurate and I don't think I meet the criteria for being notable enough, especially seen as seasoned reporters who work for my company aren't on Wikipedia, when I am, after a year of regional reporting. Seems to be an inconsistency, please delete it RobHerrick (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:08, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 13:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article is unreferenced and appears to fail WP:CREATIVE. WWGB (talk) 13:48, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems no more notable than most regional media presenters and as WWGB points out, entirely unreferenced. (OT Interesting, and somehow appropriate, that journalists are classed as Creative professionals in WP:BIO. A ring of truth there! -- Mattinbgn\talk 13:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I support the subject's claim that he's not (yet) notable. The 'quotes' section is extremely quotidian. AlexTiefling (talk) 13:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete When the subject himself says that the article fails WP:NOTABILITY it should not be staying on wikipedia. It should be deleted without further nominations of any sort. Kalivd (talk) 14:18, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm inclined to agree with the nominator on this one; Maybe an article will be warranted in the future? Delete per WP:N. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 14:32, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete on notability grounds (not because the subject of the article has requested it), would not seem to meet WP:BIO. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.