Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert H. Tucker, Jr.
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- Robert H. Tucker, Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The notability of this businessperson has been questioned at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_23#Robert_H._Tucker.2C_Jr I think it's pretty marginal, but throwing it up for discussion. Legacypac (talk) 18:58, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment AfD is not a debate forum. This is a Request for Comment (RfC) and discussion should be moved to the talk page of the article. Unscintillating (talk) 23:56, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Huh? If the questions are "Is this notable?" and "Should it be deleted?", AfD is absolutely the forum. --BDD (talk) 15:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't see you citing from our WP:Deletion policy. Unscintillating (talk) 00:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Huh? If the questions are "Is this notable?" and "Should it be deleted?", AfD is absolutely the forum. --BDD (talk) 15:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete as nomfor he is a standard run of the mill small business person not notable enough for an article. His business has not been deemed notable enough for an article. Being the ex-husband of a slightly notable actress does not rub notability off on him. Legacypac (talk) 01:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination counts as a deletion !vote, you need not do that again. Of course you can add further comments where you feel appropriate. Regards—UY Scuti Talk 17:01, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete at best as I saw this when it was nominated and was not entirely certain what to comment but, looking at it now, it perhaps seems questionable. Delete at best for now. SwisterTwister talk 05:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 17:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 17:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete the article seems to be built from the four books listed in the bibliography section. But when I searched those books, Tucker's name only comes up, at most, four or five times in each of them, which I would characterize as a trivial mention. The only other mention I turned up online is the Times-Picayune article, which isn't about him, but is about Tucker's daughter. Tucker himself only merits a mention early on. I don't think there is anything in here to suggest any particular notability - he seems to have been a mildly successful businessman who was involved in the community - nor is there enough reliable sources to create a page. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.