Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Galea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 07:21, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Robert Galea

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Robert Galea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, not notable through searches. Doesn't pass WP:Notability Not enough coverage through news searches. JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 01:22, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:43, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:44, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

• Keep this article needs serious reworking but he's a notable contemporary Christian singer and reality television participant from The X Factor (see [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 01:48, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Response, but not all X Factor participants have articles, and he if under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music) he doesn't solidly meet any of the criteria. If so it's very ambiguous. JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 02:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Of all of the sources you posted, only one qualifies for WP:GNG:

1. Catholic Digest: OK.
2. The Catholic Weekly: Not significant coverage. Focuses only on one event.
3. Word on Fire: Not independent. Interview with the artist.
4. GIA Publications: Not secondary. Biography from the artist's publisher.
5. Sandhurst Youth Ministry: Not secondary. The artist is affiliated with this organization.
6. National Catholic Register: Not independent. Interview with the artist.
7. Ave Maria Press: Not secondary. Biography from the artist's publisher.
8. Aleteia: Not significant coverage. Focuses on one song release.
9. YouTube: Not secondary. Self-published by the artist.

— Newslinger talk 09:38, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:50, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:50, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:50, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:50, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malta-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:50, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

• Keep Passes WP:MUSICBIO. I have added content and sources (including some news ones).shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:51, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets WP:GNG. Coverage from The Sydney Morning Herald and Catholic Digest is enough. — Newslinger talk 09:38, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
• Keep as reliable sources coverage has been identified as shown above, passes WP:GNG, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
• Keep searches found sufficient WP:SIGCOV, added another news article to those added by Newslinger.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:46, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.