Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Coupe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, no prejudice against recreation if reliable sources have been found.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:48, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Coupe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While there are some of this author's books have been collected ([1]), I don't see any evidence that he or his works have received in-depth attention by reliable sources. Additional sources welcomed, as always. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:54, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:02, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:02, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:02, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not seeing any reliable sources that show his notability as an author. Malke 2010 (talk) 23:12, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article has been marked as a BLP unsourced article longer than any other existing article. Since obviously no one has ever been able to find good sources on this guy, the article's time is up. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:09, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.